On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:42:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >
> > > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > > debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:42:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >
> > > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > > debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5. Make the latter
> > have the same .TH line at the top as does the forme
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5. Make the latter
> > have the same .TH line at the top as does the form
> I've tried the solution proposed by Joey (using the .TH field in the
> man source), but it didn't work... so I think the only way is to do
> it manually as many of you have suggested.
Oh hmm, I'd forgotten that the .TH line typically has the man page name
in all upper-case, which means there is
> I've tried the solution proposed by Joey (using the .TH field in the
> man source), but it didn't work... so I think the only way is to do
> it manually as many of you have suggested.
Oh hmm, I'd forgotten that the .TH line typically has the man page name
in all upper-case, which means there i
"Marco Presi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sr> Hrm, the cleanest solution would be to send the manpages to the upstream
> sr> maintainer and have him edit the build scripts so that the correct
> sr> manpage gets installed.
> It is not possible, because the man pages were written by
> me. Prist
|| On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:16:26 +0200
|| Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sr> Marco,
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if the man
"Marco Presi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sr> Hrm, the cleanest solution would be to send the manpages to the upstream
> sr> maintainer and have him edit the build scripts so that the correct
> sr> manpage gets installed.
> It is not possible, because the man pages were written by
> me. Pris
|| On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:16:26 +0200
|| Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sr> Marco,
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if the man
Marco,
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
Actually the server program itself should h
|| On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:21:09 -0400
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> Marco Presi wrote:
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Marco Presi wrote:
> > My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> > different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> > options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
Marco,
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
Actually the server program itself should
|| On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:21:09 -0400
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> Marco Presi wrote:
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Marco Presi wrote:
> > My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> > different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> > options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
Marco Presi wrote:
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
> I don't know how to resolve t
"Marco Presi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
> I don't
Marco Presi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-08 22:45:23 +0200]:
> I am packaging a multiple binary from a single sources. The two
> binaries provides the same server functionality and differs just for
> compilation options, let's say:
>
> "server" and "server-enhanced".
Are they overlapping pac
On Sun, 08 Sep 2002, Marco Presi wrote:
> I am packaging a multiple binary from a single sources. The two
> binaries provides the same server functionality and differs just for
> compilation options, let's say:
>
> "server" and "server-enhanced".
>
> My problem is this: for the two pac
Marco Presi wrote:
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
> I don't know how to resolve
Hi mentors!!
I am packaging a multiple binary from a single sources. The two
binaries provides the same server functionality and differs just for
compilation options, let's say:
"server" and "server-enhanced".
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different m
"Marco Presi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
> I don'
Marco Presi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-08 22:45:23 +0200]:
> I am packaging a multiple binary from a single sources. The two
> binaries provides the same server functionality and differs just for
> compilation options, let's say:
>
> "server" and "server-enhanced".
Are they overlapping pa
On Sun, 08 Sep 2002, Marco Presi wrote:
> I am packaging a multiple binary from a single sources. The two
> binaries provides the same server functionality and differs just for
> compilation options, let's say:
>
> "server" and "server-enhanced".
>
> My problem is this: for the two pa
Hi mentors!!
I am packaging a multiple binary from a single sources. The two
binaries provides the same server functionality and differs just for
compilation options, let's say:
"server" and "server-enhanced".
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different
26 matches
Mail list logo
