Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-20 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Giacomo A. Catenazzi [090320 10:08]: > >Too often, though, such files are a set of license *terms* only (e.g. > >the text of the GPL), with no copyright status or explicit *grant* of > >license. That's not enough for Debian to know the rights of > >recipients: mere inclusion of license terms is

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-20 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Ben Finney wrote: [note: quotations in random order] (We're now in ‘debian-legal’ territory; please follow up there.) Too often, though, such files are a set of license *terms* only (e.g. the text of the GPL), with no copyright status or explicit *grant* of license. That's not enough for Deb

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-19 Thread Ben Finney
(We're now in ‘debian-legal’ territory; please follow up there.) Dominik Smatana writes: > One more "license-newbie" question: > > In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at > beginning: > > // Please see included LICENSE.TXT > > licensecheck says "UNKNOWN" of cour

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:51:25AM +0100, Dominik Smatana wrote: > Hello, > > thank you for answers.. I'll contact upstream author. > > One more "license-newbie" question: > > In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at > beginning: > > // Please see included LICENSE.

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-19 Thread Dominik Smatana
Hello, thank you for answers.. I'll contact upstream author. One more "license-newbie" question: In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at beginning: // Please see included LICENSE.TXT licensecheck says "UNKNOWN" of course... Is such reference to external file suf

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-19 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11693 March 1977, Dominik Smatana wrote: > Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy & paste > from "main" file)? Talk to upstream. Unless you have written the files it is *NOT* yours to declare them being licensed in whatever way. -- bye, Joerg hmm, I should fill in the b

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:20 +0100, Dominik Smatana wrote: > Hello, > > there are missing licenses in some source files in upstream project > I'm packaging for Debian. > > There is just license in the "main" source file. > > Is it fine? > > Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-18 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Dominik Smatana wrote: > Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy & paste > from "main" file)? Please don't do this yourself! Ask upstream to fix this and better to provide entire PACKAGE license (It is also possible that some files can be unde

Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-18 Thread Dominik Smatana
Hello, there are missing licenses in some source files in upstream project I'm packaging for Debian. There is just license in the "main" source file. Is it fine? Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy & paste from "main" file)? Thanks for advice. Dominik Smatana -- To