On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:18:55PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Shortly after you published your RFS I tried 'rpg' but quickly discarded it
> because from the first look I found no new functionality. (pwgen is more
> feature rich)
It is not issue of functionality. Need to repeat again: the on
On Sunday 08 April 2012 12:58:08 Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> The problem is that I don't see this "review process" here. Instead, all of
> You are explaining what Debian is and what is not. But I've got no much
> new. You are trying to breach into opened door. But point is that all this
> discussio
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 11:20:55PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> to get rid of it. It's thus reasonable that we want to make sure
> packages are in good shape for entry in Debian. It's also natural that
It is very easy to execute this task: please, read this shell script. It
is short and simple
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:48:27AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> > So I don't understand, why do You think my package is worse of those
>> > garbage and how it break "coherence".
>>
>> I don't have a position one way or another on whether
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> barrier to entry there: Debian should be a coherent operating system
>
> Very good. But to keep system in "coherent" state You should not only
> build barrier on entry, but
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:48:27AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> No need to send copies to me of messages that you're also sending to
> this forum.
Sorry, it was my fault: first I send it to You instead of list, then
notice this and send it to list.
> > So I don't understand, why do You think my pa
No need to send copies to me of messages that you're also sending to
this forum.
Vladimir Stavrinov writes:
> So I don't understand, why do You think my package is worse of those
> garbage and how it break "coherence".
I don't have a position one way or another on whether any of your
packages i
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> barrier to entry there: Debian should be a coherent operating system
Very good. But to keep system in "coherent" state You should not only
build barrier on entry, but also remove packages that break such
coherence. And this should be n
Vladimir Stavrinov writes:
> But for a last at least 15 years I've wrote tens of such scripts, that
> I am using for years in my work and life with enjoy and no problems.
> And now, I think, why don't make those lot of software available for
> Debian users? But I see: because there are army of fo
9 matches
Mail list logo
