Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Jan C. Nordholz
Hi Shaun, > As a sponsored upload, I'd normally have to rebuild the binaries and > the changes file as well. What magic debuild command line did you use? > I see the .orig.tar.gz file is included in the `Files' section of the > .changes file. debuild -sa should do the trick (-sa is passed through

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 7/3/07, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I *think* dupload should do the Right Thing if applied to the changes file as is (well, re-signed). As a sponsored upload, I'd normally have to rebuild the binaries and the changes file as well. What magic debuild command line did you use? I s

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/3/07, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I unexpectedly have access to a Debian box all this week. I'm on contract and have other commitments, but I should be able to upload monotone for you at some point. My only question is whether the unusual -0.2 version will bungle anything -- alt

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
Hello Zack, I unexpectedly have access to a Debian box all this week. I'm on contract and have other commitments, but I should be able to upload monotone for you at some point. My only question is whether the unusual -0.2 version will bungle anything -- although I understand the version number is

Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Zack Weinberg
The Debian packages of monotone have not been updated in some time, and are currently both unbuildable and uninstallable, due to the Boost 1.34 transition. I am one of the upstream developers, and use Debian myself; I asked the maintainer (Shaun Jackman) if he needed help and he said yes, would I