On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Paul Wise wrote:
> On 8/20/07, Giovanni Mascellani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1].
>
> I'd suggest a -r option for md5sum would be a better thing to work on,
> unless the GNU folks rejected it?
Why even bother with th
On 8/20/07, Giovanni Mascellani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1].
I'd suggest a -r option for md5sum would be a better thing to work on,
unless the GNU folks rejected it?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 07:06:13PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi all!
> These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1]. Although it is
> my first compiled package (the other was in Python), I'm not having any
> technical problem. I have just a bunch of question for you about the
>
Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> This file is surely GPL and not in the public domain. Isn't illegal to
>> link GPL object code with other non-GPL object code and don't
>> distribute it as GPL? In other words, because of only this GPL file,
>> all the
Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi all!
Hi
> These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1]. Although it is
> my first compiled package (the other was in Python), I'm not having any
> technical problem. I have just a bunch of question for you about the
> license. I don't know if you should w
Hi all!
These days I am trying to package md5deep for Debian[1]. Although it is
my first compiled package (the other was in Python), I'm not having any
technical problem. I have just a bunch of question for you about the
license. I don't know if you should write to debian-legal, or you can
help me
6 matches
Mail list logo
