> so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
> package only -dev, or is it agains policies?
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-static
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:57:48AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > I have got another problem. Libstrophe only provides .a file, no .so,
> > so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
> > package only -dev, or is it agains policies?
>
> Not that I'm aware of, but I very mu
On 2014-04-25 07:58, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>> On 24.04.14 10:23:23, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I have got another problem. Libstrophe only provides .a file, no .so,
> so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
> package only -dev, or is it agains policies?
Not that I'm a
>On 24.04.14 10:23:23, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
> It is sufficient to change these to eg:
>
>usr/lib/*/lib*.a
Thanks for this.
I have got another problem. Libstrophe only provides .a file, no .so,
so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
package only -dev, or is it
On 2014-04-24 08:16, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> dh_install: libstrophe-dev missing files (usr/lib/lib*.a), aborting
>
> The libstrophe.a file is installed into /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu,
> instead of /usr/lib. When should the .a file be installed into
> /usr/lib and when into x86... ?
The new
Hi,
I am packaging libstrophe XMPP library in order to introduce www.profanity.im
to Debian.
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/tdi/dev/libstrophe-0.8.4'
/bin/mkdir -p
'/home/tdi/dev/libstrophe-0.8.4/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu'
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 libstrophe.a
'/home/tdi/dev
6 matches
Mail list logo
