On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 at 18:05:58 +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:29:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'm very glad to hear that work's being done on dpkg-source that should
> > (if I understand it correctly) obsolete this hack.
>
> my i ask you what is the work on dp
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:29:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[snip]
> I'm very glad to hear that work's being done on dpkg-source that should
> (if I understand it correctly) obsolete this hack.
>
my i ask you what is the work on dpkg-source you are talking about?
> --
> Colin Watson
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 at 18:05:58 +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:29:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'm very glad to hear that work's being done on dpkg-source that should
> > (if I understand it correctly) obsolete this hack.
>
> my i ask you what is the work on d
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:29:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[snip]
> I'm very glad to hear that work's being done on dpkg-source that should
> (if I understand it correctly) obsolete this hack.
>
my i ask you what is the work on dpkg-source you are talking about?
> --
> Colin Watson
--- Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >
"Michèl" == Michèl Alexandre Salim
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And if you come up with a clean solution for the
> changelog issue, I
> agree this is worth doing. If you do that, please
> let me know what
> your solution is.
>
As Richard Atter
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 06:31:54PM +0100, Michèl Alexandre Salim wrote:
[debian/ in upstream makes maintaining package difficult]
> The reason I raise this issue in the first place is actually a
> notion that it would be nice for users wanting bleeding-edge
> software to update from CVS and just ru
--- Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun,
Jun 03, 2001 at 11:40:26PM -0300, Henrique
> de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> files there. Even if
> > upstream keeps its debian/ up-to-date, it will
> still cause you trouble if
> > you have to remove a file, as you'll need to
> either use dirty tr
> "Michèl" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Michèl> The reason I raise this issue in the first place is
Michèl> actually a notion that it would be nice for users wanting
Michèl> bleeding-edge software to update from CVS and just run
Michèl> debian/ru
> "Michèl" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michèl> Hello, A general observation of Unix programs in general -
Michèl> a lot more of them come with RPM spec files, even
Michèl> generates them automatically from a spec.in file, than
Michèl> with debian scrip
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:01:20AM +0100, Mich?l Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Rather a neat idea. And certainly I have seen it
> implemented - for Enlightenment 0.17 CVS for instance.
> It is still the duty of the Debian maintainer to make
> sure the Debian version of the scripts conform to
> Debian sp
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:01:20AM +0100, Mich?l Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Rather a neat idea. And certainly I have seen it
> implemented - for Enlightenment 0.17 CVS for instance.
> It is still the duty of the Debian maintainer to make
> sure the Debian version of the scripts conform to
> Debian s
--- Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >
"Michèl" == Michèl Alexandre Salim
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And if you come up with a clean solution for the
> changelog issue, I
> agree this is worth doing. If you do that, please
> let me know what
> your solution is.
>
As Richard Atte
> "Michèl" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Michèl> The reason I raise this issue in the first place is
Michèl> actually a notion that it would be nice for users wanting
Michèl> bleeding-edge software to update from CVS and just run
Michèl> debian/r
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 06:31:54PM +0100, Michèl Alexandre Salim wrote:
[debian/ in upstream makes maintaining package difficult]
> The reason I raise this issue in the first place is actually a
> notion that it would be nice for users wanting bleeding-edge
> software to update from CVS and just r
> "Michèl" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michèl> Hello, A general observation of Unix programs in general -
Michèl> a lot more of them come with RPM spec files, even
Michèl> generates them automatically from a spec.in file, than
Michèl> with debian scri
--- Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun,
Jun 03, 2001 at 11:40:26PM -0300, Henrique
> de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> files there. Even if
> > upstream keeps its debian/ up-to-date, it will
> still cause you trouble if
> > you have to remove a file, as you'll need to
> either use dirty t
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:40:26PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Most of the time, no. Upstream debian/ cruft gets in the way of the updated
> debian/ files, especially if you need to delete files there. Even if
> upstream keeps its debian/ up-to-date, it will still cause you trouble
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:40:26PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Most of the time, no. Upstream debian/ cruft gets in the way of the updated
> debian/ files, especially if you need to delete files there. Even if
> upstream keeps its debian/ up-to-date, it will still cause you troubl
On Mon, 04 Jun 2001, Jason Thomas wrote:
> hmmm, I just had the upstream remove the debian specific stuff so I
> could have policy compilant stuff and use the debhelper stuff more.
I also did the same in fetchmail. It gets easier to maintain a package that
has no debian/ directory (which is often
hmmm, I just had the upstream remove the debian specific stuff so I
could have policy compilant stuff and use the debhelper stuff more.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:14:20AM +0100, Mich?l Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A general observation of Unix programs in general - a
> lot more of them com
Hello,
A general observation of Unix programs in general - a
lot more of them come with RPM spec files, even
generates them automatically from a spec.in file, than
with debian scripts.
Probably a function of the majority of Linux users /
programmers working on RPM-based systems but I am
curious a
On Mon, 04 Jun 2001, Jason Thomas wrote:
> hmmm, I just had the upstream remove the debian specific stuff so I
> could have policy compilant stuff and use the debhelper stuff more.
I also did the same in fetchmail. It gets easier to maintain a package that
has no debian/ directory (which is often
hmmm, I just had the upstream remove the debian specific stuff so I
could have policy compilant stuff and use the debhelper stuff more.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:14:20AM +0100, Mich?l Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A general observation of Unix programs in general - a
> lot more of them co
Hello,
A general observation of Unix programs in general - a
lot more of them come with RPM spec files, even
generates them automatically from a spec.in file, than
with debian scripts.
Probably a function of the majority of Linux users /
programmers working on RPM-based systems but I am
curious
24 matches
Mail list logo
