Re: Information on uploaded packages

2002-02-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:04:26AM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to assist in the RC bugsquashing. What I find is that some > bugs are because a specific library is in unstable, but not in testing. > > Now shouldn't packages automatically go to testing after 2 weeks if > ther

Re: Information on uploaded packages

2002-02-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:04:26AM +0200, Alwyn Schoeman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to assist in the RC bugsquashing. What I find is that some > bugs are because a specific library is in unstable, but not in testing. > > Now shouldn't packages automatically go to testing after 2 weeks if > the

Information on uploaded packages

2002-02-18 Thread Alwyn Schoeman
Hi, I'm trying to assist in the RC bugsquashing. What I find is that some bugs are because a specific library is in unstable, but not in testing. Now shouldn't packages automatically go to testing after 2 weeks if there exist no critical bugs against it? How can I see on what date a package was

Information on uploaded packages

2002-02-18 Thread Alwyn Schoeman
Hi, I'm trying to assist in the RC bugsquashing. What I find is that some bugs are because a specific library is in unstable, but not in testing. Now shouldn't packages automatically go to testing after 2 weeks if there exist no critical bugs against it? How can I see on what date a package wa