Re: Including object (.o) files in a package - linda errors

2005-03-25 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
On 03/25/2005 10:41 AM, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: >>lin{da,tian} shouldn't complain about an object file which is not >>linked with anything, since, well, it cannot be. > > OK, I will file a bug against linda then. (any objections?) Filed at http://bugs.debian.org/301392 .

Re: Including object (.o) files in a package - linda errors

2005-03-25 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi Justin, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I was hoping that someone else would respond to this, since I'm just > fumbling for an answer. Maybe I can provoke one:) > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:02:34PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: >> > arcturus[6]:~/Debian/mn-fit% linda -i mn-fit-dev_5.05-1_powerpc.

Re: Including object (.o) files in a package - linda errors

2005-03-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi list, > > I am packaging mn_fit (source package is named mn-fit; currently stuck > in NEW). Upstream tells me that the capability exists for users to > create a customized version of mn_fit by linking their own Fortran > source code with mn_fit

Re: Including object (.o) files in a package - linda errors

2005-03-23 Thread Justin Pryzby
I was hoping that someone else would respond to this, since I'm just fumbling for an answer. Maybe I can provoke one:) On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:02:34PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Hi list, > > I am packaging mn_fit (source package is named mn-fit; currently stuck > in NEW). Upstream tell

Including object (.o) files in a package - linda errors

2005-03-18 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi list, I am packaging mn_fit (source package is named mn-fit; currently stuck in NEW). Upstream tells me that the capability exists for users to create a customized version of mn_fit by linking their own Fortran source code with mn_fit static libraries and the mn_fit main object file, mn_main_k