Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-25 Thread Hidetaka Iwai
Hello, Sorry for late answer. Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed. > > Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp > > bug #166973, or submit new ITP? > I think it

Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-25 Thread Hidetaka Iwai
Hello. Sorry that my answer is so late. Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I asked Rasmus Lerdorf about php4-ming and libming, as he used them in his > presentation at linux.conf.au recently, and I was working on QAing them for > Debian (before they were

Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-25 Thread Hidetaka Iwai
Hello, Sorry for late answer. Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed. > > Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp > > bug #166973, or submit new ITP? > I think it

Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-25 Thread Hidetaka Iwai
Hello. Sorry that my answer is so late. Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I asked Rasmus Lerdorf about php4-ming and libming, as he used them in his > presentation at linux.conf.au recently, and I was working on QAing them for > Debian (before they were

Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-23 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:49:54PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > libming currently has two grave bugs, one of which indicates that it > > needs source changes to make it work with the current PHP API. > > Unless you can address all of these (upstream presumed dead and the > grave bugs), you sh

Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-23 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hidetaka Iwai wrote: > I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed. > Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp > bug #166973, or submit new ITP? I think it would be best to submit a new ITP, maybe providing a reference to the RFA/removal bug. Before

Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-23 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:49:54PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > libming currently has two grave bugs, one of which indicates that it > > needs source changes to make it work with the current PHP API. > > Unless you can address all of these (upstream presumed dead and the > grave bugs), you sh

ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-23 Thread Hidetaka Iwai
Hello, I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed. Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp bug #166973, or submit new ITP? 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=166973 regards, -- Hidetaka Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-23 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hidetaka Iwai wrote: > I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed. > Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp > bug #166973, or submit new ITP? I think it would be best to submit a new ITP, maybe providing a reference to the RFA/removal bug. Before

ITA with already removed packages

2004-02-23 Thread Hidetaka Iwai
Hello, I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed. Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp bug #166973, or submit new ITP? 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=166973 regards, -- Hidetaka Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBS