On Friday 23 March 2007 20:23, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I have created a new version of libspf2 and intend to adopt it if I can
> find a sponsor (and/or co-maintainer). It fixes (hopefully) all outstanding
> bugs except one. 20_64bit_types.patch may need some testing. I hope that
> some DD is inter
On Friday 23 March 2007 20:53, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:23:38PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...)
>
> Have not taken a look at the package, but does the short description
>
> > Description: Sender Policy Framework library, written in C
>
> really have
On Friday 23 March 2007 20:50, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a bit irritated by the following sentence in README.Debian-source:
> | It's completely out of date anyway.
>
> Could you please explain?
Well, it is. It's an expired I-D from 2004, and nowadays there's even a real
RFC. But I
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:23:38PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
(...)
Have not taken a look at the package, but does the short description
> Description: Sender Policy Framework library, written in C
really have to say "written in C" ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hi,
I am a bit irritated by the following sentence in README.Debian-source:
| It's completely out of date anyway.
Could you please explain?
Greetings
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
retitle 372629 ITA: libspf2 -- Sender Policy Framework library, written in C
owner 372629 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
I have created a new version of libspf2 and intend to adopt it if I can find a
sponsor (and/or co-maintainer). It fixes (hopefully) all outstanding bugs
except one. 20_64bit_types.p
6 matches
Mail list logo