❦ 1 juillet 2015 12:52 +0200, Jakub Wilk :
>>So, should I:
>>
>>* Not remove the user on purge (as I have seen done in other packages)
>
> There seem to be consensus that system users should not be
> removed. Please see bug #621833 for details.
The thread is mostly dead and it seems that at so
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:07:29PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its
> daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts
> complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are
> not guaranteed to be
* Cameron Norman , 2015-06-30, 14:07:
I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its daemon
with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts
complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are
not guaranteed to be installed at the time of post
❦ 30 juin 2015 14:07 -0700, Cameron Norman :
> I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its
> daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts
> complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are
> not guaranteed to be installed at th
I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its
daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts
complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are
not guaranteed to be installed at the time of postrm.
So, should I:
* Not remove the user
5 matches
Mail list logo
