On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 04:44:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Well, your Makefile.am doesn't say you need to build the lib before the
> > binary.
>
> Strange. I have never seen such kind of specification and I assumed
> that this is automatically the case.
No, it cannot know that in -lfoo
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsmithwaterman
>> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>> Well, your Makefile.am doesn't say you need to build the lib before the
>> binary.
>
> Strange. I have never seen such kind of specification and I
Hi Andrey,
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 01:00:28PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 05:31:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thinks I've fixed the issue for bug #897797 in Git[1] for
> > libsmithwaterman but somehow it fails to build for a different
> > reason
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 05:31:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thinks I've fixed the issue for bug #897797 in Git[1] for
> libsmithwaterman but somehow it fails to build for a different
> reason now. Any idea why this might happen:
>
> ...
> make all-am
> make[2]: Entering directory
Hi,
I thinks I've fixed the issue for bug #897797 in Git[1] for
libsmithwaterman but somehow it fails to build for a different
reason now. Any idea why this might happen:
...
make all-am
make[2]: Entering directory '/build/libsmithwaterman-0.0+git20160702.2610e25'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
5 matches
Mail list logo