Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> As you can see, there is nested declaration here. It's wrong. Looks like
> this code was working due to some GCC bug. Other compilers forbids this
> too.
To expand/clarify, this is not a "nested declaration", but rather a
redefiniti
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Andreas Tille escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to follow the hints to fix this problem but failed.
> Any more skilled C++ programmer than me who might have a clue?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
[snip]
> - Forwarded message from Matthias Klose -
> sets.cpp:703:31
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 09:45:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to follow the hints to fix this problem but failed.
> Any more skilled C++ programmer than me who might have a clue?
Hi,
It's just incorrect code (sets.cpp):
703 for (int i=0; i count;
708 vector acount;
Hi,
I tried to follow the hints to fix this problem but failed.
Any more skilled C++ programmer than me who might have a clue?
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Matthias Klose -
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:11:40 +
From: Matthias Klose
To: mainto...@bugs.debian.org
4 matches
Mail list logo
