On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 05:11:54PM +, Ben Hill wrote:
> > > I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this
> > > version a different version number?
> > >
> > > For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different
> > > format?
> >
> > No. In my opinion i
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 17:55 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hello Ben,
>
> * Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-26 17:48]:
> > I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this
> > version a different version number?
> >
> > For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or us
Hello Ben,
* Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-26 17:48]:
> I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this
> version a different version number?
>
> For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different
> format?
No. In my opinion it is the best thing to
also sprach Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.26.1746 +0100]:
> I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this
> version a different version number?
Use the Debian revision and send patches upstream.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`
Hi,
I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this
version a different version number?
For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different
format?
Cheers,
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
5 matches
Mail list logo