Re: Handling bug 113493

2002-01-29 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: > all...). so the woody tag is certainly not appropiate anymore. Should I > close the bug, since it is fixed in the current package (actually it was > fixed , or tag it potato instead (because the buggy version is in > potato)? G

Re: Handling bug 113493

2002-01-29 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Stefan Schwandter wrote: > fixed , or tag it potato instead (because the buggy version is in ^ | | a long time ago) regards, Stefan -- http://www.shockfrosted.org

Handling bug 113493

2002-01-29 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Hi, I'm not shure what to do with this bug. The version of snd having this bug is not in woody anymore (at present, snd it is not in woody at all...). so the woody tag is certainly not appropiate anymore. Should I close the bug, since it is fixed in the current package (actually it was fixed ,

Re: Handling bug 113493

2002-01-29 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: > all...). so the woody tag is certainly not appropiate anymore. Should I > close the bug, since it is fixed in the current package (actually it was > fixed , or tag it potato instead (because the buggy version is in > potato)?

Re: Handling bug 113493

2002-01-29 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Stefan Schwandter wrote: > fixed , or tag it potato instead (because the buggy version is in ^ | | a long time ago) regards, Stefan -- http://www.shockfrosted.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Handling bug 113493

2002-01-29 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Hi, I'm not shure what to do with this bug. The version of snd having this bug is not in woody anymore (at present, snd it is not in woody at all...). so the woody tag is certainly not appropiate anymore. Should I close the bug, since it is fixed in the current package (actually it was fixed ,