Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This reasoning exactly describes a "Recommends" relationship. It's not
> the package's fault that apt-get doesn't support Recommends.
FWIW, dselect and aptitude (and probably other frontends I don't know)
support it fine.
We also don't remove accen
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This reasoning exactly describes a "Recommends" relationship. It's not
> the package's fault that apt-get doesn't support Recommends.
FWIW, dselect and aptitude (and probably other frontends I don't know)
support it fine.
We also don't remove acce
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:54:33AM +1100, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
> I think a lot of documents need pstoimg and nowadays a lot of people
> just use plain apt. Upgrading gs from recommends to depends should be
> ok. Most people who have tex system running would have gs anyway.
This reasoning exact
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:54:33AM +1100, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
> I think a lot of documents need pstoimg and nowadays a lot of people
> just use plain apt. Upgrading gs from recommends to depends should be
> ok. Most people who have tex system running would have gs anyway.
This reasoning exac
Thank you,
I think a lot of documents need pstoimg and nowadays a lot of people
just use plain apt. Upgrading gs from recommends to depends should be
ok. Most people who have tex system running would have gs anyway.
regards,
Chanop
Once in debian galaxy, I heard Robert Bihlmeyer say
> Chanop
Chanop Silpa-Anan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is in the Recommends list. If one doesn't have any character that
> latex2html wants to convert to an image, it would work properly, hence
> only Recommends (I beleive this is the reason from previous maintainer).
If latex2html is sufficiently us
Chanop Silpa-Anan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is in the Recommends list. If one doesn't have any character that
> latex2html wants to convert to an image, it would work properly, hence
> only Recommends (I beleive this is the reason from previous maintainer).
If latex2html is sufficiently u
It is in the Recommends list. If one doesn't have any character that
latex2html wants to convert to an image, it would work properly, hence
only Recommends (I beleive this is the reason from previous maintainer).
What do you think?
regards,
Chanop
For once, I heard Ryan Murray said
> Package:
8 matches
Mail list logo
