My preference is for a plain mailing list, at least until debbugs
#645974/#485697 is fixed to unbreak threading.
Back to the topic, I don't mind either way since I mostly ignore
debian-mentors these days.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors
Arno Töll writes:
> Hi,
> Jakub asked me to forward his comment from IRC to thhis list (where he's
> not subscribed anymore as some might remember):
>
> 14:14 < jwilk> IME the problem with mailing lists that nobody reads is
> that from time to time some misguided people will post to them. Worse,
Hi,
Jakub asked me to forward his comment from IRC to thhis list (where he's
not subscribed anymore as some might remember):
14:14 < jwilk> IME the problem with mailing lists that nobody reads is
that from time to time some misguided people will post to them. Worse,
they'll expect that somebody an
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:39:33 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> What about creating a list as owner of the pseudo-package dedicated to
> BTS traffic (including control messages) named
> sponsorship-requests@l.d.o. Furthermore, the mentors list should still
> get bug traffic (only). Therefore we would subsc
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
> [*] jwilk looked into the code and it /seems/ to me, the "bts"
> subscription does not contain control messages, whereas "bts-control"
> control does. Can anyone verify this?
I confirm this.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debia
Gergely Nagy writes:
>
> That sounds like a good idea, though closing mails would be useful on
> -mentors@ too, not sure whether that counts as bug traffic or
> control. But that's just a nice to have thing, in my opinion, one can
> always manually subscribe to interesting RFS bugs anyway.
>
Peop
Arno Töll writes:
> What about creating a list as owner of the pseudo-package dedicated to
> BTS traffic (including control messages) named
> sponsorship-requests@l.d.o. Furthermore, the mentors list should still
> get bug traffic (only). Therefore we would subscribe that list via PTS
> subscript
Hello,
some (most?) of us found the signal/noise ratio on the debian-mentors
list significantly worse since we switched to a BTS based workflow.
Having that said, I am sitting next to formorer, one of our list
masters, on the LinuxTag right now and we ended up to discuss this
problem again (c.f.
8 matches
Mail list logo
