Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-02 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:58:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I guess the binary needs to be setuid in order to write into score file. > >You have to do it... according to debian policy, games should be > >setuid games in order to write to score file

Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Rene Weber
Hello Peter, On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 03:10:40PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > It's very easy to install a chroot potato within your slink > machine. That's what I do to build packages. Start with the > instructions below (probably not placing the tree under /tmp if > you want to keep it)

Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Rene Weber
Hello Colin, On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:58:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > That's set*g*id. Policy 5.10 explicitly says that games must not be > setuid. Thanks for the pointer. I guess I should have taken a much closer look at the policy manual. Mea culpa. This means I'll have to

Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Rene Weber
Hello Sean, On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 11:30:24AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > simply place your name as maintainer in the control file and make sure your > name is the one listed in the changelog for the version you release. Ah, so nothing is official until the package actually gets

Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Colin Watson
Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 02:16:50PM -0400, Rene Weber wrote: >> Also, umoria is (to my reading) non-free. The licence forbids it from >> being used in a commercial manner (see below for an excerpt from my >> debian/copyright file). Is this a problem?

Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I figured this might save some people some time. If you want to > set up a small debian install to see if your build dependancies > work in the real world, or to find out what build deps your > package needs in the first place, just type the

Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Rene Weber wrote: > (3) I have slink (stable) installed on my debian machines, so of course > umoria is compiled against older libraries. Is this a problem? I can > upgrade one of the machines to unstable if necessary, but that machine is a > lot slower, so I'd really rather not. It's very

Re: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 02:16:50PM -0400, Rene Weber wrote: > Hello, > ... > > Also, umoria is (to my reading) non-free. The licence forbids it from > being used in a commercial manner (see below for an excerpt from my > debian/copyright file). Is this a problem? The binary is also s

RE: ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
u want is suidregister. > Beyond these, I have some general questions about developing for/under > Debian that I haven't found explicitly mentioned in the docs (although there > are so many of them I've only gone through them once, so I might very well > have missed somethi

ITP umoria, and general questions for a new developer

2000-06-01 Thread Rene Weber
The licence forbids it from being used in a commercial manner (see below for an excerpt from my debian/copyright file). Is this a problem? The binary is also setuid (games). I can probably change the source so it's just setgid, but I haven't done that yet. Is that ok? Beyo

Re: General questions about debian-alpha...

1998-06-29 Thread Kristoffer . Rose
Dear `Debian mentors', Now with 2.0 beta out you might have time to accept me into the crowd? I am especially interested in contributing work on - easy maintenance of small multi-architecture installations (i386+alpha+sparc in my own installation), in particular problems related to sharing

Re: General questions about debian-alpha...

1998-06-17 Thread Paul Slootman
On Tue 16 Jun 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Kevin Squire wrote: > >> built the package for Debian-Alpha. I kind of wish there were, but then > >> that would imply that there was a separate maintainer for the Alpha port, > >> which doesn't seem to be the case Should there be? (Side questio

Re: General Questions

1998-05-02 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 1 May 1998, Bob Hilliard wrote: > The upstream Makefiles in all of the the dict packages have a > line in the distclean target that removes Makefile and configure. > That would make it necessary to run autoconf after make distclean in > order to compile again. The Makefiles do _not_

Re: General Questions

1998-05-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bob> Since $(make_directory) calls install -d, which creates missing Bob> leading directories as required, would there be any problems Bob> caused by using one statement, as below, instead of three? Bob> $(make_directory) debian/tmp/usr/sbin

General Questions

1998-05-02 Thread Bob Hilliard
Thanks to Santiago and Igor for helping me on the non-free distribution question. My initial group of packages had no lintian errors, and installed without error on my system, so I have uploaded them. I now have some general questions. The upstream Makefiles in all of the the