On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
> >
> > If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
> > but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
> > binary image need to go into
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:10:49AM -0500, Itai Zukerman wrote:
> I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
>
> If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
> but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
> binary image ne
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
> >
> > If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
> > but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
> > binary image need to go int
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:10:49AM -0500, Itai Zukerman wrote:
> I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
>
> If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
> but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
> binary image n
I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
binary image need to go into non-free or contrib?
I'm guessing contrib, and then the em
I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
binary image need to go into non-free or contrib?
I'm guessing contrib, and then the e
6 matches
Mail list logo
