On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 08:57:44PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:08:49PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > If I fix a bug in my package, and send the patch upstream, should
> > the bug be marked "forwarded", or should "forwarded" be reserved for
> > bugs that are waiting
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 08:57:44PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:08:49PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > If I fix a bug in my package, and send the patch upstream, should
> > the bug be marked "forwarded", or should "forwarded" be reserved for
> > bugs that are waiting
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:08:49PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> If I fix a bug in my package, and send the patch upstream, should
> the bug be marked "forwarded", or should "forwarded" be reserved for
> bugs that are waiting for upstream to fix?
If you've informed the upstream about the bug,
If I fix a bug in my package, and send the patch upstream, should
the bug be marked "forwarded", or should "forwarded" be reserved for
bugs that are waiting for upstream to fix?
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Wa
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:08:49PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> If I fix a bug in my package, and send the patch upstream, should
> the bug be marked "forwarded", or should "forwarded" be reserved for
> bugs that are waiting for upstream to fix?
If you've informed the upstream about the bug,
If I fix a bug in my package, and send the patch upstream, should
the bug be marked "forwarded", or should "forwarded" be reserved for
bugs that are waiting for upstream to fix?
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull W
6 matches
Mail list logo