Re: File names in the Debian archive: *.deb vs *_i386.deb

1999-09-16 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:06:06 -0700, Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 22:42 + 1999-09-15, Zygo Blaxell wrote: >>Is that CVS repository available to non-developers? > >% cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ftpmaint login The

Re: File names in the Debian archive: *.deb vs *_i386.deb

1999-09-16 Thread Joel Klecker
At 22:42 + 1999-09-15, Zygo Blaxell wrote: On 13 Sep 1999 18:50:25 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zygo Blaxell) writes: Are the FTP archive maintenance scripts debian-packaged? No. The main one is called 'dinstall' -- it is in CVS I think but no-one ha

Re: File names in the Debian archive: *.deb vs *_i386.deb

1999-09-15 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On 13 Sep 1999 18:50:25 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zygo Blaxell) writes: >> Are the FTP archive maintenance scripts debian-packaged? > >No. The main one is called 'dinstall' -- it is in CVS I think but >no-one has packaged it, unfortunately. Several times

Re: File names in the Debian archive: *.deb vs *_i386.deb

1999-09-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zygo Blaxell) writes: > Are the FTP archive maintenance scripts debian-packaged? No. The main one is called 'dinstall' -- it is in CVS I think but no-one has packaged it, unfortunately. Several times people have said, "Real soon now" but it's still not there for some reason.

Re: File names in the Debian archive: *.deb vs *_i386.deb

1999-09-10 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:39:37 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:33:42PM +, Zygo Blaxell wrote: >> I've noticed that when I build a Debian package, I get a filename for >> the arch-specific parts of the package named something like >> "hello_1.3-14.3_i386.d

Re: File names in the Debian archive: *.deb vs *_i386.deb

1999-09-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:33:42PM +, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > I've noticed that when I build a Debian package, I get a filename for > the arch-specific parts of the package named something like > "hello_1.3-14.3_i386.deb". However, in the Debian FTP archive, the > same package is named "hello_1.

File names in the Debian archive: *.deb vs *_i386.deb

1999-09-10 Thread Zygo Blaxell
I've noticed that when I build a Debian package, I get a filename for the arch-specific parts of the package named something like "hello_1.3-14.3_i386.deb". However, in the Debian FTP archive, the same package is named "hello_1.3-14.3.deb" (with no "_i386"). Why is this? Are package files normal