"Christoph Haas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now when I install cream-doc (0.34) it looks like this:
$> dpkg -i cream-doc_0.34-2_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package cream-doc.
dpkg: considering removing cream in favour of cream-doc ...
dpkg: yes, w
Am Freitag, 10. März 2006 20:36 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> (uhm, I was replying to this, but I see that the split is already in
> the archive.
I decided for the split already and then was pointed at problems with
0.34-1 so I was rather looking for a half-decent solution now. Re-joining
the pac
Am Freitag, 10. März 2006 18:00 schrieb Simon Richter:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > 'cream' is a package with a lot of documentation. Until version 0.33 I
> > had all the files in a single package. Now in 0.34 I want to split off
> > the documentation so i have cream (main) and cream-doc
> > (docume
* Christoph Haas [Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:33:35 +0100]:
> Evening...
Hi,
(uhm, I was replying to this, but I see that the split is already in
the archive. Executive summary: please remove the conflicts; I'd
personally not split the package, but is your call; current status
good, except for t
Hello,
Christoph Haas wrote:
'cream' is a package with a lot of documentation. Until version 0.33 I had
all the files in a single package. Now in 0.34 I want to split off the
documentation so i have cream (main) and cream-doc (documentation).
That only makes sense when the documentation is l
Justin, thanks for your reply.
On Friday 10 March 2006 16:39, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> You probably want to make a new dummy package, one which I guess will
> have just copyright and changelog files, will be named "cream", and
> will have Depends: cream-doc, cream-program. This will cause existing
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Evening...
>
> one thing I never really dealt with before are package splits. And since I
> couldn't find any clear policy on how to define the dependencies properly
> I'd like to get a second (and even third) opinion on this.
>
Evening...
one thing I never really dealt with before are package splits. And since I
couldn't find any clear policy on how to define the dependencies properly
I'd like to get a second (and even third) opinion on this.
'cream' is a package with a lot of documentation. Until version 0.33 I had
8 matches
Mail list logo
