Re: Different symbols for different architectures

2014-01-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Dec 29, 2013 11:43 AM, "Paul Wise" wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > Seems that different architectures have different symbols. > > To me it doesn't look that simple, since the missing symbols are the > same on many arches. It seems like upstream is basing

Re: Different symbols for different architectures

2013-12-29 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 12/29/2013 04:24 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I maintain a new package, licenseutils, for witch I had a very bad > response from buildd: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=licenseutils&suite=sid > > Seems that different architectures have different symbols. So I'm > looking for a w

Re: Different symbols for different architectures

2013-12-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> Seems that different architectures have different symbols. > To me it doesn't look that simple, since the missing symbols are the > same on many arches. It seems like upstream is basing the > presence/absence of some pub

Re: Different symbols for different architectures

2013-12-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Seems that different architectures have different symbols. To me it doesn't look that simple, since the missing symbols are the same on many arches. It seems like upstream is basing the presence/absence of some public functions on what is r

Different symbols for different architectures

2013-12-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I maintain a new package, licenseutils, for witch I had a very bad response from buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=licenseutils&suite=sid Seems that different architectures have different symbols. So I'm looking for a way to address this issue. As dh_makeshlibs(1) states if I