Will Lowe:
> You could put each binary in a seperate package, and then each package
> could have the right dependencies.
I wonder if it would really be worth it, since the documentation and sample
scripts (which I would need to include in both packages) are as big as the
actual binaries. (Okay,
> The current package also depends on mail-transport-agent, which is needed
> (by both versions) to send mail. But, if you don't use the mail feature, it
> is not needed. Should I really have this as a dependency?
>
> Should I change them both to Recommends, or even Suggests?
You could put each b
Hi!
I'm in the process of taking over the uqwk package (having just been
accepted as an official Debian developer), and is updating it to the newest
version. One change that I'm doing is that I'm providing two binaries, one
compiled for nntp support, and one for spool support (they can't have both
3 matches
Mail list logo
