Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-20 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hallo Ben, Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jörg Sommer wrote: >> Hallo Goswin, >> >> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Just make sure to use a version that sorts lower than a future actual >> > 2.2 release. Optimaly 2.2~beta2 would be used but I think the DAK >> > st

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
Jörg Sommer wrote: > Hallo Goswin, > > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just make sure to use a version that sorts lower than a future actual > > 2.2 release. Optimaly 2.2~beta2 would be used but I think the DAK > > still doesn't accept those. 2.1.99+2.2-beta might be a good cho

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released > >sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Otherwise, what should I do? > >Wait? > You just need to take care if the program is re

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-05 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hallo Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just make sure to use a version that sorts lower than a future actual > 2.2 release. Optimaly 2.2~beta2 would be used but I think the DAK > still doesn't accept those. 2.1.99+2.2-beta might be a good choice. Good objection. I've chan

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-05 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hallo Nelson, > > Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released >>> sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Othe

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Jörg! On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I saw on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=10646&release_id=241671 > that it's a release candidate version, right? No. The source is here: http://dev.atmarama.org/xindy-2.2-beta2.tar.gz It's really outside of sour

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hallo Nelson, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released >> sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Otherwise, what should I do? >> Wait? > > Well... you c

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Otherwise, what should I do? Wait? Well... you can. I saw on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=10646&rel

Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi, I've created a package for Xindy (#362584) on the basis of a not released upstream source, because the upstream maintainer told me that the old source tree should be replaced and the old source didn't build really fine. Nearly one month ago I've asked the maintainer to release the source, but