On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 02:18:41PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2001 5:24 am, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > It doesn't look right. Your two packages (otcl1 and otcl-dev) can't
> > share the same tmpdir.
>
> Erm, why not? Surely the job of dh_movefiles is to move files out of the
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 02:18:41PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2001 5:24 am, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > It doesn't look right. Your two packages (otcl1 and otcl-dev) can't
> > share the same tmpdir.
>
> Erm, why not? Surely the job of dh_movefiles is to move files out of the
* Will Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2001 5:24 am, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > It doesn't look right. Your two packages (otcl1 and otcl-dev) can't
> > share the same tmpdir.
>
> Erm, why not? Surely the job of dh_movefiles is to move files out of the
> debian/tmp dir an
* Will Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2001 5:24 am, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > It doesn't look right. Your two packages (otcl1 and otcl-dev) can't
> > share the same tmpdir.
>
> Erm, why not? Surely the job of dh_movefiles is to move files out of the
> debian/tmp dir a
On Saturday 28 July 2001 5:24 am, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> It doesn't look right. Your two packages (otcl1 and otcl-dev) can't
> share the same tmpdir.
Erm, why not? Surely the job of dh_movefiles is to move files out of the
debian/tmp dir and into the package dirs based on package.files?
Is the
On Saturday 28 July 2001 5:24 am, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> It doesn't look right. Your two packages (otcl1 and otcl-dev) can't
> share the same tmpdir.
Erm, why not? Surely the job of dh_movefiles is to move files out of the
debian/tmp dir and into the package dirs based on package.files?
Is th
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:46:17AM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> dh_installdirs --package=otcl1 --tmpdir=./debian/tmp
> dh_installdirs --package=otcl-dev --tmpdir=./debian/tmp
>
> # Add here commands to install the package into debian/tmp
> install -d debian/tmp
>
On Saturday 28 July 2001 3:20 am, Joshua Haberman wrote:
> If your source package creates more than one binary package and the
> upstream Makefile installs everything at once, then debian/tmp and
> dh_movefiles are useful. But otherwise debian/ is easiest.
It seems I can get the package to build
* Will Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2001 2:33 am, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Why not make the change in debian/rules rather than in the package's
> > Makefile?
> >
> >
> > install -d debian/tmp
> > $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(PWD)/debian/tmp
> >
> > Should do the tri
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:46:17AM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> dh_installdirs --package=otcl1 --tmpdir=./debian/tmp
> dh_installdirs --package=otcl-dev --tmpdir=./debian/tmp
>
> # Add here commands to install the package into debian/tmp
> install -d debian/tmp
>
On Saturday 28 July 2001 2:33 am, Ben Collins wrote:
> Why not make the change in debian/rules rather than in the package's
> Makefile?
>
>
> install -d debian/tmp
> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(PWD)/debian/tmp
>
> Should do the trick.
This way I have to manually create all dirs under de
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 01:24:21AM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
>
> I've been trying to create my first debian package following the New
> Maintainers Guide, and I've run into a problem. The guide mentions that
> binaries should be installed to ./debian/tmp and then dh_movefiles will move
> them a
I've been trying to create my first debian package following the New
Maintainers Guide, and I've run into a problem. The guide mentions that
binaries should be installed to ./debian/tmp and then dh_movefiles will move
them as necessary to the correct destination. Unfortunately, while the
desti
On Saturday 28 July 2001 3:20 am, Joshua Haberman wrote:
> If your source package creates more than one binary package and the
> upstream Makefile installs everything at once, then debian/tmp and
> dh_movefiles are useful. But otherwise debian/ is easiest.
It seems I can get the package to build
* Will Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2001 2:33 am, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Why not make the change in debian/rules rather than in the package's
> > Makefile?
> >
> >
> > install -d debian/tmp
> > $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(PWD)/debian/tmp
> >
> > Should do the tr
On Saturday 28 July 2001 2:33 am, Ben Collins wrote:
> Why not make the change in debian/rules rather than in the package's
> Makefile?
>
>
> install -d debian/tmp
> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(PWD)/debian/tmp
>
> Should do the trick.
This way I have to manually create all dirs under d
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 01:24:21AM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
>
> I've been trying to create my first debian package following the New
> Maintainers Guide, and I've run into a problem. The guide mentions that
> binaries should be installed to ./debian/tmp and then dh_movefiles will move
> them
I've been trying to create my first debian package following the New
Maintainers Guide, and I've run into a problem. The guide mentions that
binaries should be installed to ./debian/tmp and then dh_movefiles will move
them as necessary to the correct destination. Unfortunately, while the
dest
18 matches
Mail list logo
