>I'm not sure I follow. Three binary packages (lib, dev, doc) is fairly
>standard for a shared library package. I would expect each git repo to
>be a separate source package, unless they are very tightly coupled together.
that was what I meant :)
the doc can be the doxygen for the library, or so
Hi,
On 01/08/16 16:43, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> I would like to create 3 packages for the core part: lib (for the shared
>> library object), dev (for headers), and doc (for documentation generated by
>> doxygen).
>
>
> maybe two binaries? I guess you need one package for each repo.
> e.
Hi,
>I would like to create 3 packages for the core part: lib (for the shared
>library object), dev (for headers), and doc (for documentation generated by
>doxygen).
maybe two binaries? I guess you need one package for each repo.
e.g.
git1 providing the lib and headers
git2 providing the core
Hi.First, let's be clear. I currently do not want to have an active activity as
a Debian maintainer. I recently created a free/libre C project, and I would
like to create clean Debian packages for it, and integrate them in Debian main.
I have no problem to be the maintainer of them, but currentl
4 matches
Mail list logo
