> Of course, octave does not use the plain Euler
> method. Nobody in their
> right mind would do that. The octave doc says the
> ODE solvers are
> "based on reliable ODE solvers written in Fortran",
> so they are
> probably both more advanced than even plain
> Runge-Kutta. You should
> test both a
> Of course, octave does not use the plain Euler
> method. Nobody in their
> right mind would do that. The octave doc says the
> ODE solvers are
> "based on reliable ODE solvers written in Fortran",
> so they are
> probably both more advanced than even plain
> Runge-Kutta. You should
> test both a
Lukas Geyer wrote:
>>22 seconds for Ocatve (i think euler method)
I'd think not.
>>8 seconds for my library's euler method
>>12 seconds for my library's runge kutta order 2
>>22 seconds for my library's runge kutta order 4
> probably both more advanced than even plain Runge-Kutta. You should
Well,
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 13:47, Halim Boukaram wrote:
[...]
> about the packaging:
> deb, rpm, key, signature?
> I pretty much gave up.
> I'll leave it up to someone else. If anyone's
> interested my projects homepage is:
> http://numerical.port5.com
>
I cannot find any bug filed against wnpp (RFP
Halim Boukaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've tested the differential equation solver for
> Ocatve (lsode) vs my own with these results:
>
> executing an ode solver 1000 times on my P4 1.8:
>
> 22 seconds for Ocatve (i think euler method)
> 8 seconds for my library's euler method
> 12 second
Lukas Geyer wrote:
>>22 seconds for Ocatve (i think euler method)
I'd think not.
>>8 seconds for my library's euler method
>>12 seconds for my library's runge kutta order 2
>>22 seconds for my library's runge kutta order 4
> probably both more advanced than even plain Runge-Kutta. You should
Well,
Hi
Its the 'C library for numerical analysis' guy again.
I've tested the differential equation solver for
Ocatve (lsode) vs my own with these results:
executing an ode solver 1000 times on my P4 1.8:
22 seconds for Ocatve (i think euler method)
8 seconds for my library's euler method
12 seconds
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 13:47, Halim Boukaram wrote:
[...]
> about the packaging:
> deb, rpm, key, signature?
> I pretty much gave up.
> I'll leave it up to someone else. If anyone's
> interested my projects homepage is:
> http://numerical.port5.com
>
I cannot find any bug filed against wnpp (RFP
Halim Boukaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've tested the differential equation solver for
> Ocatve (lsode) vs my own with these results:
>
> executing an ode solver 1000 times on my P4 1.8:
>
> 22 seconds for Ocatve (i think euler method)
> 8 seconds for my library's euler method
> 12 second
Hi
Its the 'C library for numerical analysis' guy again.
I've tested the differential equation solver for
Ocatve (lsode) vs my own with these results:
executing an ode solver 1000 times on my P4 1.8:
22 seconds for Ocatve (i think euler method)
8 seconds for my library's euler method
12 seconds
10 matches
Mail list logo
