[GSoC] Different control files when building for different architectures (Was: blends-dev gsoc 2013, debian/control file)

2013-06-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'd like to rephrase this question a bit (and also fixed the spacing of my quote in my example query below a bit which was somehow spoiled a bit). We found a way to create a set of debian/control. files. What would you consider the best way to make sure to bring the correct control file into

Re: Building for different architectures

2007-06-09 Thread David Paleino
Hi Julian, Il giorno Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:08:43 +0200 Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > I am already doing this and I own the ITP (Bug: #418613). > > The bzr branch for the package is located at: > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~juliank/command-not-found/debian > > Please lo

Re: Building for different architectures

2007-06-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > The bzr branch for the package is located at: > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~juliank/command-not-found/debian I forgot that I also uploaded a package to mentors.debian.net, http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/command-not-found/command-not-found_0.2.4+deb

Re: Building for different architectures

2007-06-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
David Paleino wrote: > Hi all Mentors, > I'm trying to port to Debian the "command-not-found" package from > Ubuntu, which suggests the installation of a package when the shell > (bash or zsh) can't find an executable (i.e.: it avoid that "command > not found" message). More info on [1]. > > What

Building for different architectures

2007-06-09 Thread David Paleino
Hi all Mentors, I'm trying to port to Debian the "command-not-found" package from Ubuntu, which suggests the installation of a package when the shell (bash or zsh) can't find an executable (i.e.: it avoid that "command not found" message). More info on [1]. What I've done is getting the list of al