Hello!
On 26-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> If you can avoid changing configure.in and Makefile.in (actually, I hope
> that's Makefile.am?), then please do. Otherwise you can end up with huge
> diffs to the genera
Hello!
On 26-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> If you can avoid changing configure.in and Makefile.in (actually, I hope
> that's Makefile.am?), then please do. Otherwise you can end up with huge
> diffs to the gener
On Friday 26 January 2001 18:06, Colin Watson wrote:
> Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> >> Most of the example code I showed was just setting Makefile variables,
> >> so it should go outside any targets (normally near the top of
> >> debian/rules).
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
>> Most of the example code I showed was just setting Makefile variables,
>> so it should go outside any targets (normally near the top of
>> debian/rules). Depending on the structure of the upstream Makefile, you
>> mi
On Friday 26 January 2001 18:06, Colin Watson wrote:
> Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> >> Most of the example code I showed was just setting Makefile variables,
> >> so it should go outside any targets (normally near the top of
> >> debian/rules)
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
>> Most of the example code I showed was just setting Makefile variables,
>> so it should go outside any targets (normally near the top of
>> debian/rules). Depending on the structure of the upstream Makefile, you
>> m
On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> Most of the example code I showed was just setting Makefile variables,
> so it should go outside any targets (normally near the top of
> debian/rules). Depending on the structure of the upstream Makefile, you
> might need to arrange for those parameters to be
On 25-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> Most of the example code I showed was just setting Makefile variables,
> so it should go outside any targets (normally near the top of
> debian/rules). Depending on the structure of the upstream Makefile, you
> might need to arrange for those parameters to be
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
>> Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
>> now that the packaging manual has been merged.
>
>Oh, merged? So all important information included in
>the Packaging manual should be prese
Hi!
On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
> now that the packaging manual has been merged.
Oh, merged? So all important information included in
the Packaging manual should be present in the Policy now?
Or is this work in pr
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
>> Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
>> now that the packaging manual has been merged.
>
>Oh, merged? So all important information included in
>the Packaging manual should be pres
Hi!
On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
> now that the packaging manual has been merged.
Oh, merged? So all important information included in
the Packaging manual should be present in the Policy now?
Or is this work in p
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've found some time to clean up my packages finally. One
>thing to do make the Debian package build with or without
>stripping the binaries and with or without debugging symbols
>according to some environment variables.
>
>I've once read about this bei
Hello!
I've found some time to clean up my packages finally. One
thing to do make the Debian package build with or without
stripping the binaries and with or without debugging symbols
according to some environment variables.
I've once read about this being a requirement for some new
policy vers
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've found some time to clean up my packages finally. One
>thing to do make the Debian package build with or without
>stripping the binaries and with or without debugging symbols
>according to some environment variables.
>
>I've once read about this be
Hello!
I've found some time to clean up my packages finally. One
thing to do make the Debian package build with or without
stripping the binaries and with or without debugging symbols
according to some environment variables.
I've once read about this being a requirement for some new
policy ver
16 matches
Mail list logo
