On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:18:34PM +0100, Judica?l Courant wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 21:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote :
>
> > You might try:
> >
> > Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), ocaml (>= X) | camlp4 (>=
> > 3.01)
> >
> > where X is the version which incorporates the for
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:18:34PM +0100, Judica?l Courant wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 21:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote :
>
> > You might try:
> >
> > Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), ocaml (>= X) | camlp4 (>= 3.01)
> >
> > where X is the version which incorporates the former
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 21:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote :
> You might try:
>
> Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), ocaml (>= X) | camlp4 (>=
> 3.01)
>
> where X is the version which incorporates the former contents of camlp4.
>
That is indeed the workaround I was speaking of. But my
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 21:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote :
> You might try:
>
> Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), ocaml (>= X) | camlp4 (>= 3.01)
>
> where X is the version which incorporates the former contents of camlp4.
>
That is indeed the workaround I was speaking of. But my q
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judica?l Courant wrote:
> Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), camlp4 (>= 3.01)
>
> in the control file of my package.
>
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflicts
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judica?l Courant wrote:
> Build-depends: debhelper (>= 3), ocaml (>= 3.01), camlp4 (>= 3.01)
>
> in the control file of my package.
>
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflict
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflicts: camlp4. I expected that
> just replacing "camlp4 (>= 3.01)" by "camlp4" (as virtual package do not
> have any version number) would make my package ok both for the former
> an
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judicaël Courant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
> (coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
>
> Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
Hi,
The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
(coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
as well as a companion tool of ocaml, named camlp4. Formerly, ocaml and
camlp4
> The latest upstream version of ocaml now provides camlp4, and the debian
> package Replaces:, Provides:, and Conflicts: camlp4. I expected that
> just replacing "camlp4 (>= 3.01)" by "camlp4" (as virtual package do not
> have any version number) would make my package ok both for the former
> a
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Judicaël Courant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
> (coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
>
> Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
Hi,
The build daemon rejected (a previous version of) the package I maintain
(coq). I was wondering whether it was my fault or rather a buildd bug?
Here is what I did: my package build-depends on a compiler named ocaml
as well as a companion tool of ocaml, named camlp4. Formerly, ocaml and
camlp
12 matches
Mail list logo
