Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, 17 lines --]
>
> On mar, may 15, 2001 at 10:45:53 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> No, you are right: all you need is docbook-to-man. See policy,
>> section 2.4.2 where this is explained in detail.
>
> Ok, I just readed
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, 17 lines --]
>
> On mar, may 15, 2001 at 10:45:53 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> No, you are right: all you need is docbook-to-man. See policy,
>> section 2.4.2 where this is explained in detail.
>
> Ok, I just readed
On mar, may 15, 2001 at 10:45:53 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> No, you are right: all you need is docbook-to-man. See policy,
> section 2.4.2 where this is explained in detail.
Ok, I just readed it. Could a version number omition of the Build-depends entry
for
docbook-to-man makes this bug (#975
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm intending to fix a silly build-depends bug. I'd did it like this:
>
> Build-depends: [...], docbook-to-man
>
> It seems that it's needed more build-depends entries for man page
> generation, the bug is #9
Thus spoke Javier Vi?uales Gutiérrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-05-15 11:10:09:
> Can anybody tell me anything about it please?, thank you.
IMHO, you should add docbook-to-man to the build-depends line, becasue
that package contains /usr/bin/docbook-to-man. The things
docbook-to-man depends on ar
Hello,
I'm intending to fix a silly build-depends bug. I'd did it like this:
Build-depends: [...], docbook-to-man
It seems that it's needed more build-depends entries for man page
generation, the bug is #97513 against hptalx package.
I thought that "Build-depends" calls his entries and his dep
On mar, may 15, 2001 at 10:45:53 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> No, you are right: all you need is docbook-to-man. See policy,
> section 2.4.2 where this is explained in detail.
Ok, I just readed it. Could a version number omition of the Build-depends entry for
docbook-to-man makes this bug (#975
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm intending to fix a silly build-depends bug. I'd did it like this:
>
> Build-depends: [...], docbook-to-man
>
> It seems that it's needed more build-depends entries for man page
> generation, the bug is #
Thus spoke Javier Vi?uales Gutiérrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-05-15 11:10:09:
> Can anybody tell me anything about it please?, thank you.
IMHO, you should add docbook-to-man to the build-depends line, becasue
that package contains /usr/bin/docbook-to-man. The things
docbook-to-man depends on a
Hello,
I'm intending to fix a silly build-depends bug. I'd did it like this:
Build-depends: [...], docbook-to-man
It seems that it's needed more build-depends entries for man page
generation, the bug is #97513 against hptalx package.
I thought that "Build-depends" calls his entries and his de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If you know, or suspect, that some might not do then make
> that knowledge explicit (at least by not listing all similar
> packages). All the packages providing *tags are probably
> pretty equivalent, but yacc, byacc, bison etc. have differences
> that mean that some gr
If you know, or suspect, that some might not do then make
that knowledge explicit (at least by not listing all similar
packages). All the packages providing *tags are probably
pretty equivalent, but yacc, byacc, bison etc. have differences
that mean that some grammars are not acceptable to all of t
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 08:13:54PM +, David Coe wrote:
> Yacc and ctags are provided by many different packages, and managed
> by update-alternatives, but there is no virtual package corresponding
> to either of them.
...
> What should I do? Thanks.
Contact the maintainers of such packages a
If this has already been discussed, please just point me to it; I must
have missed it...
Yacc and ctags are provided by many different packages, and managed
by update-alternatives, but there is no virtual package corresponding
to either of them.
I suspect there are other similar situations.
I do
14 matches
Mail list logo
