Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-08-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > If I read the code, it seems like there's something funky with the first > variable argument. What I have for now is: > > -Tcl_AppendResult(Tcl_Interp *interp, char *p, va_alist) > +void Tcl_AppendResult(Tcl_Interp *inte

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-08-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > If I read the code, it seems like there's something funky with the first > variable argument. What I have for now is: > > -Tcl_AppendResult(Tcl_Interp *interp, char *p, va_alist) > +void Tcl_AppendResult(Tcl_Interp *inte

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
Thanks, I'm using a more up to date version right now. I seem to have averted the problem of varargs; there's only 1 instance thats not in tcl/. Now the next problem is that the window initialization doesn't called called, and so xres=yres=0, which is a floating point exception.. Thanks, -- Just

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > The code uses which gcc-3.3 doesn't support. is > the new standard. I've done my best to convert the code, but I can't > solve a crash in the of the functions I had to change. This is the right approach, and your efforts are bet

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 06:02:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 05:58:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > > story see below..

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
Thanks, I'm using a more up to date version right now. I seem to have averted the problem of varargs; there's only 1 instance thats not in tcl/. Now the next problem is that the window initialization doesn't called called, and so xres=yres=0, which is a floating point exception.. Thanks, -- Just

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > The code uses which gcc-3.3 doesn't support. is > the new standard. I've done my best to convert the code, but I can't > solve a crash in the of the functions I had to change. This is the right approach, and your efforts are bet

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 06:02:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 05:58:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > > story see below..

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The code uses which gcc-3.3 doesn't support. is > the new standard. I've done my best to convert the code, but I can't > solve a crash in the of the functions I had to change. > See va_arg(3) for a reference. Here's what I did: > - C

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:10:52AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > story see below.. > > Hmm, what is upstream saying about the mess? Th

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > story see below.. Hmm, what is upstream saying about the mess? That's the point I missed in the story. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 05:58:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > story see below.. > > > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I thi

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 05:58:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > story see below.. > > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I thin

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Matt Brubeck
Justin Pryzby wrote: > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > story see below.. > > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I think. > I need xmkmf to work too. For now I have Build-Depends: gcc-3.2, but > what can I do to force it to actuall

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > story see below.. > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I think. I > need xmkmf to work too. For now I have Build-Depends: gcc-3.2, b

Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
Hi all, I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole story see below.. gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I think. I need xmkmf to work too. For now I have Build-Depends: gcc-3.2, but what can I do to force it to actually compile with that, in

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The code uses which gcc-3.3 doesn't support. is > the new standard. I've done my best to convert the code, but I can't > solve a crash in the of the functions I had to change. > See va_arg(3) for a reference. Here's what I did: > - C

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:10:52AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > story see below.. > > Hmm, what is upstream saying about the mess? Th

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 05:58:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > story see below.. > > > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I thi

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > story see below.. Hmm, what is upstream saying about the mess? That's the point I missed in the story. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 05:58:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > > story see below.. > > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I thin

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > story see below.. > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I think. I > need xmkmf to work too. For now I have Build-Depends: gcc-3.2, b

Re: Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Matt Brubeck
Justin Pryzby wrote: > I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole > story see below.. > > gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I think. > I need xmkmf to work too. For now I have Build-Depends: gcc-3.2, but > what can I do to force it to actuall

Build-Conficts: gcc-3.3, and varargs

2004-07-31 Thread Justin Pryzby
Hi all, I have a package (x11iraf) which conflicts with gcc-3.3. For the whole story see below.. gcc includes /usr/bin/gcc which is pretty much a necessity, I think. I need xmkmf to work too. For now I have Build-Depends: gcc-3.2, but what can I do to force it to actually compile with that, in