On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 15:28 -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
> It sound like you recommend incrementing the standards version and
> ignoring lintian, right?
Correct.
> As lintian helps to validate the package against the standards
> version, is there much benefit to updating the standards version
> b
On 2020-11-20 15:04:56, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:36 AM Jordan Justen wrote:
>
> > This Standards-Version is not yet recognized by lintian.
>
> When lintian is wrong about the Standards-Version being too new, it is
> best to ignore it and wait until lintian is updated.
It soun
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:36 AM Jordan Justen wrote:
> This Standards-Version is not yet recognized by lintian.
When lintian is wrong about the Standards-Version being too new, it is
best to ignore it and wait until lintian is updated.
When lintian is wrong in general, file a bug report, unless
On 2020-11-19 01:01:28, Leon Marz wrote:
>
> cglm (0.7.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release
>* Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1
This Standards-Version is not yet recognized by lintian. You can
verify this with lintian, and it is also shown in the lintian section
on m
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cglm":
* Package name: cglm
Version : 0.7.9-1
Upstream Author : Recep Aslantas
* URL : https://github.com/recp/cglm
* License : Expat
* Vcs
5 matches
Mail list logo
