Bug#897238: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

2018-05-10 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 08:29:29AM +, Lumin wrote: > > He put forward a simpler solution: Just don't provide libblas.so.3, such > > that MKL will never be used to satisfy the dependency of libblas.so.3 . > > Based on his idea, my new solution is the follows: > > > > libmkl-rt -- > > Depen

Bug#897238: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

2018-05-02 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 12:14:17PM +, Lumin wrote: > Since libmkl-rt Provides libblas.so.3, it is not totally safe even > if we set its priority to 1. That's because MKL will still be selected > when there is only one libblas.so.3 provider, namely MKL. Due to > this reason, I appended libopenb