Control: tags 871693 - moreinfo
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Stephen Dennis
wrote:
> The latest package at mentors has the version restriction removed.
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 01:00:21PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
>> >
The latest package at mentors has the version restriction removed.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 01:00:21PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> > > > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >=
> 2.28.0.
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 01:00:21PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> > > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >= 2.28.0.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Fixing.
> > You've changed it to >= 2.25-5. Why? Also, why this restriction is needed?
> >
>
> I don't know what the guidance is for ve
Thank you for the feedback and for the effort it takes to review these
packages.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:05:26PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >= 2.28.0.
> > >
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:05:26PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >= 2.28.0.
> >
>
> Fixing.
You've changed it to >= 2.25-5. Why? Also, why this restriction is needed?
I've run license-reconcile on the package, it shows a lot of copyri
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
> Are you sure you need autotools-dev?
>
Removing.
> By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >= 2.28.0.
>
Fixing.
> So now to talk about the dpkg-shlibdeps warningsI think the problem
> is really dh_makeshlibs
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 02:55:57PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> Ah. missed the compat level because I changed the it to version 10 in the
> debian/control file. Next upload will have debian/compat of 10, and
> debian/control has "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10.0.0), binutils (>=
> 2.28.0), autot
Found a way to suppress/fix the warnings.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Stephen Dennis
wrote:
> Ah. missed the compat level because I changed the it to version 10 in the
> debian/control file. Next upload will have debian/compat of 10, and
> debian/control has "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10
Ah. missed the compat level because I changed the it to version 10 in the
debian/control file. Next upload will have debian/compat of 10, and
debian/control has "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10.0.0), binutils (>=
2.28.0), autotools-dev (>= 20161112.1)"
So now to talk about the dpkg-shlibdeps warni
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:11:26PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> The build logs says:
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: cannot find library libmux.so needed by
> debian/tinymux/usr/lib/tinymux/game/bin/stubslave (ELF format:
> 'elf64-x86-64' abi: '0201003e'; RPATH: '')
> dpkg-shlibdeps: wa
Control: tags 871693 - moreinfo
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:32:54AM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal [RC bug will auto-
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:32:54AM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal [RC bug will auto-remove package on the 20th]
That statement actually means "put "important" here if RC".
> Changes since t
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [RC bug will auto-remove package on the 20th]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux"
* Package name: tinymux
Version : 2.10.1.14-1
Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis
* URL : https://www.tinym
13 matches
Mail list logo
