Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-09-19 Thread Harish Sriram
Hi Andrey, There are three RC Bugs for etcd. The fix for #866194 is included here. #857842 is raised on a amd and I am not sure if same set of tests fail on ppc. And I do not have a amd setup to work with. A partial fix which fixes few of the test fails is included here. Other test failures occu

Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-07-28 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:10:35PM +0530, Harish Sriram wrote: > > No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1. > > Please use dch --nmu and read > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu > > Uploaded a new version with proper name. Thanks

Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-07-28 Thread Harish Sriram
> No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1. > Please use dch --nmu and read > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu Uploaded a new version with proper name. Thanks! > Besides, there are three RC bugs in the package while this NMU

Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-07-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:42:02PM +0530, Harish Sriram wrote: > Here is the link to the uploaded package. > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/etcd/etcd_3.1.8+dfsg-2 > +nmu1.dsc No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1. Please u

Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-07-26 Thread Harish Sriram
Hi, Here is the link to the uploaded package. https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/etcd/etcd_3.1.8+dfsg-2 +nmu1.dsc Harish

Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-07-26 Thread Harish Sriram
Hello Tobias, The package is uploaded without errors. Thanks. Harish