Bug#858476: RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library

For some reason, the latest version enabled SHA-224 only on amd64. Upstream advised that the algorithm should be available on all architectures. I uploaded an updated package to Mentors , but did not cross-build. Will you please try again? Thank you! On

Bug#858476: RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wolfssl": > > * Package name: wolfssl > Version : 3.10.2+dfsg-1 > It builds those binary packages: > > libwolfssl10 - wolfSSL encryption library vs libwolfssl3 in

Bug#858476: RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library

Well, the security issue is probably worth fixing, but it may not make sense to ship the library in stretch. No other official packages depend on it. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > > Changes since

Bug#858476: RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release. > * New major version is 10 > * New maintainer email address > * Fixes a low level vulnerability for buffer overflow when loading a > malformed temporary DH file >

Bug#858476: RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wolfssl": * Package name: wolfssl Version : 3.10.2+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : wolfSSL Inc. * URL : www.wolfssl.com * License : various Secti