Sean Whitton wrote:
> After the release of stretch, I intend to work on removing xpdf from the
> archive for the reason that it is unmaintainable, not because it depends
> on poppler.
Orphaning does not mean that a package is unmaintainable. As I've
stated elsewhere I will continue to be willing
Svante Signell wrote:
> What else do you need? What are your problems with a _real_ upstream xpdf?
You don't seem to get what everyone is telling you. If you are not
capable of or willing to maintain xpdf with the poppler backend, then
you should not be its maintainer.
If a non-popplerized xpdf
2 matches
Mail list logo
