Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2017-01-02 Thread Alberto Luaces
Sean Whitton writes: [... Elided completed tasks ...] > > Please accept my apologies for not raising these suggestions in a > previous e-mail, and thank you for your patience with this sponsorship > process -- I'm confident I'll be able to upload after your next update. > > (don't forget dch -r)

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-30 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Alberto, On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 05:01:29PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > > > > If not, you should merge the changelog entries for -1 and -2. It's just > > confusing to have changlog entries that never made it into the Debian > > archive. > > > > Well, it seemed cle

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-29 Thread Alberto Luaces
Hello Sean, Sean Whitton writes: > Hello Alberto, > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:43:29PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: >> I have now pushed a new release. > > Did someone else upload 0~git20161123-1? > No... > > If not, you should merge the changelog entries for -1 and -2. It's just > confusing

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Alberto, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:43:29PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > I have now pushed a new release. Did someone else upload 0~git20161123-1? If not, you should merge the changelog entries for -1 and -2. It's just confusing to have changlog entries that never made it into the Debia

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-28 Thread Alberto Luaces
Sean Whitton writes: > Hello Alberto, > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:31:53PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: >> Thanks, Sean. I have addressed the gbp.conf and changelog issues and I >> think the realease is ready to go. > > Thanks again for your work. > > gbp.conf says upstream-branch=upstream but

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Alberto, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:31:53PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > Thanks, Sean. I have addressed the gbp.conf and changelog issues and I > think the realease is ready to go. Thanks again for your work. gbp.conf says upstream-branch=upstream but your upstream sources are on a bran

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-28 Thread Alberto Luaces
Thanks, Sean. I have addressed the gbp.conf and changelog issues and I think the realease is ready to go. Please tell me if you think that something is still missing.

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-28 Thread Sean Whitton
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello Alberto, On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 04:48:05PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > After cloning the mentioned repository, one can generate both the source > and the binary packages from it issuing > > gbp buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian --git-

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-19 Thread Alberto Luaces
Thanks, Sean. After cloning the mentioned repository, one can generate both the source and the binary packages from it issuing gbp buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian --git-upstream-branch=master

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-19 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Alberto, You need to provide an orig tarball (or tell a potential sponsor how to make one from your repo), and it would be good to note that your packaging is on the debian branch, not the master branch. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-19 Thread Alberto Luaces
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I have packaged a new version of yasnippet-snippets: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/yasnippet-snippets.git/ I am looking for someone in the Debian Emacsen team to sponsor this upload. Thanks!