Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-10-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >I would like the bug to be closed by the package being sponsored. remove moreinfo tag once you addressed the missing points then G.

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-10-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:56:35AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >It's using it indirectly for the crypto support. I've added the > > >Build-Depends to make the use more explicit and asked the upstream > >author to add the linking exception for ssl. He agreed about adding it >

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-10-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >It's using it indirectly for the crypto support. I've added the >Build-Depends to make the use more explicit and asked the upstream >author to add the linking exception for ssl. He agreed about adding it >but I don't know when that will officially happen. so, closing this RFS until the N

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-10-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 04:26:32PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hi Goswin, > > Am Montag, den 11.07.2016, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow: > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" > > > >

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-09-24 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi Goswin, Am Montag, den 11.07.2016, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" > >  Package name: ifstat >  Version : 1.1-9 >  Upstream Author : Gal Rouallan

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Andrew Shadura
On 8 August 2016 at 13:28, Bartosz Fenski wrote: > C us czg, x zf Are you sure about that? -- Cheers, Andrew

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Bartosz Fenski
C us czg, x zf Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone Laurent Bigonville wrote >On 08/08/16 12:09, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 11:45 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: >> >>> TBH I don't want to use alternatives if the two tools are not using the >>> same flags, for example,

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On 08/08/16 12:09, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 11:45 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: TBH I don't want to use alternatives if the two tools are not using the same flags, for example, arping has two implementation in debian using alternatives (or being installed in two different paths

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 11:45 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > TBH I don't want to use alternatives if the two tools are not using the  > same flags, for example, arping has two implementation in debian using  > alternatives (or being installed in two different paths, not sure  > anymore) but they

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 08/08/16 à 11:18, Paul Wise a écrit : On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: Maybe the best idea would then be to have iproute2 ship the ifstat utility as iproute2-ifstat (or similar), keep ifstat as the name for the ifstat package, and if a Linux admin wants to have ifstat

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Maybe the best idea would then be to have iproute2 ship the > ifstat utility as iproute2-ifstat (or similar), keep ifstat > as the name for the ifstat package, and if a Linux admin > wants to have ifstat be the iproute2 thing, they can easi

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Christian Seiler
On 08/08/2016 10:36 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Ifstat upstream is alife and responsive. The command is just complete, > no new features have been added. So I guess we should keep ifstat, if > only for kfreebsd and hurd. Maybe the best idea would then be to have iproute2 ship the ifstat util

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 07:12:24PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:39 +0200 Goswin von Brederlow > wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > Hi, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" > > I have a question, is the ifstat package really still needed? It s

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-07-30 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:39 +0200 Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Dear mentors, > Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" I have a question, is the ifstat package really still needed? It seems to be dead upstream (last release is from 2004). The iproute2 package (which is

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-07-11 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" here we are sir >More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. interesting website, indeed! > * Update to debhelper version 9 (Closes: #817499, #828348). > * Add mu

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-07-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" Package name: ifstat Version : 1.1-9 Upstream Author : Gal Roualland URL : http://gael.roualland.free.fr/ifstat/ License : GPL Section :