Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

2015-08-25 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 25 août 2015 14:46 GMT, Gianfranco Costamagna  : > 1) please don't set architectures fields that way. > Either choose !arm64 (it should work) or (in my opinion the best way) > leave any. > > When llvm will transition (and it should transition as soon as gcc is sorted > out), > a simple binNMU

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

2015-08-25 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 25 août 2015 17:05 +0200, Daniel Stender  : >> I don't see any obvious problem. Did you already contact Jakub about >> this RFS? It's always easier for the previous maintainer to check a new >> upload. >> >> I would also suggest to move the package to a more modern packaging by >> using "dh" (b

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

2015-08-25 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 25 août 2015 16:23 +0200, Daniel Stender  : > I'm looking for an uploader for my new package of American Fuzzy Lop (afl), > which > is on ITA [1]. Hi Daniel! I don't see any obvious problem. Did you already contact Jakub about this RFS? It's always easier for the previous maintainer to check

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

2015-08-25 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Daniel some issues I found: 1) please don't set architectures fields that way. Either choose !arm64 (it should work) or (in my opinion the best way) leave any. When llvm will transition (and it should transition as soon as gcc is sorted out), a s

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

2015-08-25 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'm looking for an uploader for my new package of American Fuzzy Lop (afl), which is on ITA [1]. The package is Git-ized here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/afl.git Build log: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/afl_1.86b-1_am