Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-09 Thread Tony Houghton
On 08/07/15 07:09, Vincent Cheng wrote: NameError: name 'reload' is not defined debian/rules:48: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_clean' failed Oh, I didn't notice reload was python 2 only. And setdefaultencoding doesn't work any more in python 3 anyway. However, I was able to build you

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-07 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Tony, On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > On 07/07/15 09:21, Vincent Cheng wrote: > >> UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position >> 836: ordinal not in range(128) >> >> debian/rules:36: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed >> >> I've a

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-07 Thread Tony Houghton
On 07/07/15 09:21, Vincent Cheng wrote: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 836: ordinal not in range(128) debian/rules:36: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed I've attached the full build log. I think the problem is that the PC you tried the bu

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-06 Thread Tony Houghton
On 04/07/15 22:29, Vincent Cheng wrote: (If you have time, please upload an updated package to mentors so it's easier to discuss any further changes.) I've done that, hopefully it will be available by the time you read this. The Breaks/Replaces I've decided on are as follows: Package: roxterm

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-04 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > One other point I noticed is that currently I have roxterm-data Breaks > and Replaces roxterm << 3.0.0-1 (actually I put 2 instead of 3 by > mistake so that needs changing anyway), where roxterm << 3 is the old > virtual package. As there is

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-04 Thread Tony Houghton
On 04/07/15 10:19, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: My thinking is that anybody still using roxterm-gtk2 has some good reason to do so and will not want to upgrade to a GTK3 version even if it means missing out on the latest features and bug fixes; they

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Tony Houghton , 2015-07-03, 16:30: The way I get the parallel option looks quite nasty too, is there a better way to do that? The code currently reads: ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) NUMJOBS = $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) CONFIGURE_CO

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-04 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: >> - d/rules: CFLAGS = $(shell dpkg-buildflags | grep '^CFLAGS=') is >> quite brittle; I suggest using dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS instead >> (ditto for CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS) > > > That's better, I don't know how I missed that, unless it's a r

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-03 Thread Tony Houghton
On 02/07/15 21:09, Vincent Cheng wrote: Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi Tony, On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: I thought I had released 2.9.6-1 and 2.9.7-1 via sponsorship too, but for some reason the current version in unstable is still 2.9.5-1. Is the

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-02 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi Tony, On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm" > > * Package name: roxterm >Version : 3.0.1-

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-01 Thread Tony Houghton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm" * Package name: roxterm Version : 3.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Tony Houghton * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License : GPL2+ Sectio