Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-11-30 Thread David Douard
On 11/09/2015 08:51 AM, David Douard wrote: > On 11/06/2015 04:30 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> Hi, >> > Hi, I've (at last) reuploaded a version of circus (0.12.1) on mentors. I've disabled the tests, as suggested by Gianfranco, in order to have a package. I'll try to figure out how to

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-11-09 Thread David Douard
On 11/06/2015 04:30 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > Hi sorry I had no time to spend on this RFS, but yes I'm still interested in finishing it (I do currently use circus it on several setups). I'll take time this week to respond and fix the packaging. cheers, David > ping, if yo

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-11-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, ping, if you are still interested, please answer and fix the above :) (or ask about how to fix it) otherwise I'll close the RFS and unassign myself, I do not like to keep RFS bugs open for too long time, and there is no need to upload if you ar

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I use pbuilder-dist, and it doesn't work either ['sudo', 'HOME=/home/locutus', 'ARCHITECTURE=amd64', 'DISTRIBUTION=sid', 'ARCH=amd64', 'DIST=sid', 'DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=', 'pbuilder', '--build', '--distribution', 'sid', '--buildresult', '/home/locutus/pbuilder/sid_result', '--basetgz', '/home/locu

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:50:21AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > After a quick search, Luca Falavigna pointed me to the fact that debomatic > uses a no-network wrapper for sbuild > (runs sbuild in an "unshare -n" env) in which the lo device was not up. He > uploaded a fix for this a couple of > da

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi David, >After a quick search, Luca Falavigna pointed me to the fact that debomatic >uses a no-network wrapper for sbuild >(runs sbuild in an "unshare -n" env) in which the lo device was not up. He >uploaded a fix for this a couple of >days ago, so I'd like to try a new build from the same

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-19 Thread David Douard
On 10/15/2015 03:09 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, actually it is *so* easy to debug. Hi > > it builds successfully here too. > Probably somewhere the buildd machines have some restrictions on the ports > you can open on localhost > (or maybe they have services on the ports). > > I thi

Re: Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-15 Thread David Douard
On 10/15/2015 03:09 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, actually it is *so* easy to debug. > > it builds successfully here too. > Probably somewhere the buildd machines have some restrictions on the ports > you can open on localhost > (or maybe they have services on the ports). > > I think we

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, actually it is *so* easy to debug. it builds successfully here too. Probably somewhere the buildd machines have some restrictions on the ports you can open on localhost (or maybe they have services on the ports). I think we can just disable the testsuite and live happy, or disable the tests

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-15 Thread David Douard
On 10/15/2015 02:18 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > well, it FTBFS on both pbuilder and sbuild environments... > > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/circus/0.12.1+dfsg-1/buildlog > humm, what's problematic is that it BFS nicely with sbuild (in a sid chroot) on my laptop

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
well, it FTBFS on both pbuilder and sbuild environments... http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/circus/0.12.1+dfsg-1/buildlog cheers, G. Il Giovedì 15 Ottobre 2015 13:48, David Douard ha scritto: On 10/15/2015 11:42 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: tags -1 mo

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-15 Thread David Douard
On 10/15/2015 11:42 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > So please ping me as soon as you have fixed the above. Should be ok (I hope) David > > cheers, > > G. > > > > > Il Giovedì 15 Ottobre 2015 11:11, David Douard ha > scritto: > On 10/13/2015 07:17 PM, Gi

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: tags -1 moreinfo So please ping me as soon as you have fixed the above. cheers, G. Il Giovedì 15 Ottobre 2015 11:11, David Douard ha scritto: On 10/13/2015 07:17 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi David > > quick review: Thanks, > > 1) control: runt

Re: Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-15 Thread David Douard
On 10/13/2015 07:17 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi David > > quick review: Thanks, > > 1) control: runtime dependencies: > > please let python:Depends to its job indeed > I see in setup.py > install_requires = ['iowait', 'psutil', 'pyzmq>=13.1.0', 'tornado>=3.

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Hi David quick review: 1) control: runtime dependencies: please let python:Depends to its job I see in setup.py install_requires = ['iowait', 'psutil', 'pyzmq>=13.1.0', 'tornado>=3.0'] (also: why some dependencies are not listed here?) 2) rules/control: please consider u

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-08 Thread David Douard
On 10/07/2015 08:13 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 03:32:35PM +0200, David Douard wrote: >> Hi Andrey >> >> I've just uploaded a new version of the package (circus_0.12.1+dfsg-1). >> As you can see, I've renamed it to add a +dfsg suffix as you requested. > I: circus sourc

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 03:32:35PM +0200, David Douard wrote: > Hi Andrey > > I've just uploaded a new version of the package (circus_0.12.1+dfsg-1). > As you can see, I've renamed it to add a +dfsg suffix as you requested. I: circus source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright circus/test

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-10-06 Thread David Douard
Hi Andrey I've just uploaded a new version of the package (circus_0.12.1+dfsg-1). As you can see, I've renamed it to add a +dfsg suffix as you requested. Cheers, David -- David DOUARD LOGILAB Directeur du département Outils & Systèmes +33 1 45 32 03 12david.dou...@logi

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 09:31:18AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > so what's your opinion? Do you want me to make a 0.12.0+dfsg-1 package or > is the already uploaded one is eventually enough? I would change the version for my own package. > I'm not sure the dfsg flag really makes se

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-09 Thread David Douard
Hi Andrey, so what's your opinion? Do you want me to make a 0.12.0+dfsg-1 package or is the already uploaded one is eventually enough? I'm not sure the dfsg flag really makes sense here since the removed files are not removed for licencing reasons, but mainly because they are useless... David

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 15:11:34 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > > >> Version : 0.12.0-1 > > > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team > > > reject. > > Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jc

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > >> Version : 0.12.0-1 > > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject. > Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpler > to > keep the same version, since I've m

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-02 Thread David Douard
On 07/01/2015 07:24 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:02:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: >> Version : 0.12.0-1 > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject. Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpl

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:02:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > Version : 0.12.0-1 I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject. > * remove buildout related files from the source package As your orig tarball differs from the upstream repo (and the repo found

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-06-29 Thread David Douard
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "circus" * Package name: circus Version : 0.12.0-1 Upstream Author : Mozilla developers and others * URL : http://github.com/circus-tent/circus * License : A