Great! Thank you very much.
Best,
Daniel
On 18.06.2015 16:37, Rintze Zelle wrote:
> http://citationstyles.org/developers/ now says "Note. All versions of
> the CSL schema have recently been relicensed under the more
> permissible MIT license, and the GitHub repository will soon be
> updated to re
http://citationstyles.org/developers/ now says "Note. All versions of
the CSL schema have recently been relicensed under the more
permissible MIT license, and the GitHub repository will soon be
updated to reflect this change.".
I'll add the MIT license to the repository and change the "rights"
blu
Thank you very much for the reply. Yes I think a link to something like
this on the project's page would do it until then, great! I'll check for it
and put in the copyright register in the package, then.
Greetings,
Daniel
On 14.06.2015 17:26, Rintze Zelle wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Bruce D'Arcus an
Hi Daniel,
Bruce D'Arcus and I think that the MIT license might be the best
option for relicensing the CSL schema. I just proposed the change on
our mailing list
(http://xbiblio-devel.2463403.n2.nabble.com/MIT-license-as-default-for-CSL-software-tp7579193p7579395.html),
but I don't expect any obje
Hi Rintze,
(we've been in contact last year on my TUGBOAT article on CSL)
I'm packaging Brecht Machiel's citepyroc-py for Debian and we have an issue
over the license of the CSL scheme files (schema/*) which are shipped with this:
for the locales and the style files it's clearly stated (headers,
5 matches
Mail list logo
