Bug#765747: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#765747: RFS: openldap/2.4.40-1 [RC]

On 19/10/14 12:10 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: > I know very little about openldap, but git log seems ok and I see other > people > testing and reviewing your RFS, so if nobody steps up before, I'm willing to > sponsor this in the coming week. That would be fantastic, thank you very much for offering!

Bug#765747: RFS: openldap/2.4.40-1 [RC]

Ryan Tandy writes: > On 18/10/14 02:26 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Ryan Tandy writes: >> >>>* debian/slapd.init.ldif: >> >> Btw: why do you give rigths to the RootDN explicitly? Doesn't it skip >> all ACL processing anyway? > > Good point, again; I hadn't noticed that. In debian/slapd.c

Bug#765747: RFS: openldap/2.4.40-1 [RC]

Hi Ferenc, thank you very much for your comments! On 18/10/14 02:26 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ryan Tandy writes: > >> - Invoke find, chmod, and chown with -H in case /var/lib/ldap is a >>symlink. (Closes: #742862) > > You mean chgrp, not chmod. Right. Thanks. >>* debian/slap

Bug#765747: RFS: openldap/2.4.40-1 [RC]

I backported your package to wheezy and upgraded a machine carrying a partial replica. The upgrade failed, so I added the -s option to the slapadd call in the postinst. Please consider using it. Btw. is the dump/restore necessary with MDB? I found no information about the format incompatibiliti

Bug#765747: RFS: openldap/2.4.40-1 [RC]

Ryan Tandy writes: > - Invoke find, chmod, and chown with -H in case /var/lib/ldap is a >symlink. (Closes: #742862) You mean chgrp, not chmod. >* debian/slapd.README.Debian: Add a note about database format > upgrades and the consequences of missing one. (Closes: #594711)

Bug#765747: RFS: openldap/2.4.40-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-openldap-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openldap". Package name: openldap Version : 2.4.40-1 Upstream Author : The OpenLDAP Project