Hi Daniel,
thanks for finalising nltk. I just sponsored the package since I it was
fine in terms of packaging.
Hint for the SoB[1] mechanism: I really want you to care for the injection
of the package into the Blends framework. Since you do not have commit
permissions I would have proxied the n
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#755718: RFS: nltk/3.0.0b1-1 [ITP] -- Python Natural
Language Toolkit
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:31:40 +0200
From: Daniel Stender
To: Andreas Tille
Hi Andreas,
thank you for your offer. That's interesting and I think Nltk woul
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 01:29:04AM +0200, Daniel Stender wrote:
> The package now builds with the apis while just the examples have
> been left out - they need the corpus data any, which isn't shipped
> with the upstream tarball, so this might be a non issue at last.
I might consider sponseri
The package now builds with the apis while just the examples have been
left out - they need the corpus data any, which isn't shipped with the
upstream tarball, so this might be a non issue at last.
Greetings,
Daniel Stender
--
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0
C879 5E4
There is an open issue with the documentation:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/07/msg00349.html
Greetings,
Daniel Stender
--
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0
C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'm searching for an sponsor of my initial package of Nltk 3.0:
http://www.nltk.org/
This is a major library for Natural language processing, but although
the WNPP-Bug really is from 2004, it haven't made it into Debian so far:
https://bugs
6 matches
Mail list logo
