Paul Gevers wrote:
> > It is done by `make distclean'.
>
> I hate to disagree, but for me it doesn't.
Of course, sorry about that :(. Make does not recurse into the Tests
directory by default. Fixed, and I explicitly delete them before the
build too.
> E.g. it seems that you removed libtool fo
On 15-07-14 18:52, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Whatever you do, to prevent accidental usage of a pre-build object
>> file it is very common to at least clean them.
>
> It is done by `make distclean'.
I hate to disagree, but for me it doesn't. After `make distclean` the
files are
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 15-07-14 16:05, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > I don't understand. It is quite common for a package not to build
> > some part of the source; this is not a problem at all as long as
> > everything is DFSG-compliant. Which is the case here.
>
> This is true if you mean that not
On 15-07-14 16:05, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> Well, the source has to be DFSG-free. How we guarantee that usually is
>> by building everything from source during the build. If you don't want
>> to build it, you have to remove them from source and repack
>
> I don't understand. It is quite common for
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 15-07-14 14:54, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Hmm, but I have not overridden them, I don't feel I should. I have
> > informed upstream and I hope it won't happen in subsequent releases.
>
> Well, to document this fact is exactly why an override would be nice.
OK, I added the o
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Before I upload this package to the new queue, could you please
> comment on the lintian errors about missing source?
The reason for these is gnustep-make's incapable dist rule, combined
with not so careful upstream.
> I am looking for a statement like: "I added lintian overr
On 15-07-14 14:54, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Before I upload this package to the new queue, could you please
>> comment on the lintian errors about missing source?
>
> The reason for these is gnustep-make's incapable dist rule, combined
> with not so careful upstream.
>
>> I am
Hi Yavor,
And an additional remark: the COPYING file and the headers in several
(all?) source files don't match. The COPYING file says LGPL-2.1+ while
the headers say LGPL-2+. Please update your d/copyright file to match
the situation.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
Before I upload this package to the new queue, could you please comment
on the lintian errors about missing source?
I am looking for a statement like: "I added lintian overrides for these
files as the source is available several directories
9 matches
Mail list logo
