Re: Bug#740626: ITP missing for package libde265 with RFS 740626 with ITP in title

2014-04-07 Thread Ross Gammon
On 04/07/2014 06:40 PM, Joachim Bauch wrote: > Hi, > > On 07.04.2014 16:01, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: >> According to [0], libde265 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 740626 >> title. >> Please, could you file this ITP bug? > > I was assuming #740626 is my ITP bug: > https://bugs.debi

Bug#740626: ITP missing for package libde265 with RFS 740626 with ITP in title

2014-04-07 Thread Joachim Bauch
Hi, On 07.04.2014 16:01, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: > According to [0], libde265 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 740626 > title. > Please, could you file this ITP bug? I was assuming #740626 is my ITP bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740626 Isn't that correct?

Bug#740626: ITP missing for package libde265 with RFS 740626 with ITP in title

2014-04-07 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
According to [0], libde265 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 740626 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s